As businesses evolve, so do their compensation strategies. It may be challenging for some private companies to attract and retain top-tier talent, and that’s why long-term incentive plans play a pivotal role. The idea is clear: offer a market-competitive long-term incentive that enhances the retention and motivation of the recipient over the long-term all while shifting the total compensation to greater pay for performance.
While this approach sounds straightforward, crafting effective long-term incentive plans for private companies is intricate and often requires thoughtful compensation consulting support. Here are some key considerations to keep in mind.
Determining the Right Type of Compensation Element
In the vast landscape of long-term incentive compensation, choosing the right type of compensation element – equity, phantom stock, long-term cash, deferred compensation, etc. – is paramount. Different alternatives cater to varying business needs, executive expectations, and tax consequences.
A structured executive compensation analysis can help private companies evaluate which long-term incentive vehicle best aligns with their compensation philosophy, growth trajectory, and shareholder priorities. A few of the more prevalent long-term incentive plans are:
- Restricted Stock Units (RSUs): RSUs represent a company’s promise to give shares or cash equivalent to the value of its shares at a future date. Unlike stock options, RSUs have inherent value upon vesting, ensuring that the executive receives something tangible, strengthening the retention value of the award. For private companies anticipating a future liquidity event, RSUs may also serve as a bridge between current performance and long-term enterprise value creation.
- Stock Options: These grant the executive the right, but not the obligation, to purchase a company’s stock at a predetermined price. They can be particularly appealing because they allow executives to benefit from the company’s future growth. From an executive compensation design perspective, stock options reinforce a direct link between pay and shareholder value, a principle often central to broader compensation strategy discussions.
- Phantom Stock: Phantom stock is designed to mimic actual equity ownership, and can look and feel like a stock option or RSU; however it is designed to settle in cash upon vesting. Phantom stock is frequently used in private company environments as it can make recipients feel like owners without diluting the company’s shareholders. Many privately held organizations favor phantom equity as part of their employee compensation strategy because it supports alignment without triggering immediate governance or cap table complexity.
For a more comprehensive review of all private company long-term incentives with associated pros and cons, see our quick guide for cash-based LTI plans.
Setting Clear Vesting Schedules to Support Compensation Governance
Vesting schedules serve as the timeline and conditions under which executives can claim their long-term incentive compensation. They ensure executives are committed and contributing to the company’s growth over an extended period. Thoughtful vesting design is not just administrative; it is a critical element of compensation governance and long-term retention strategy.
Common vesting provisions:
-
- Cliff Vesting:
Here, the executive must wait for the full vesting period (typically 3 years) to complete before the award vests. Cliff vesting is a common approach in private company environments, as it pushes out a company’s liabilities related to long-term incentive awards to a point well in the future. This structure can also simplify financial forecasting while reinforcing retention at key inflection points.
- Graded or Ratable Vesting:
This vesting schedule allows for a portion of a granted award to vest periodically, say annually over a four-year period, over the lifecycle of the vesting term. A recipient would need to complete the vesting period to become fully vested, but contrary to the cliff vesting approach, such vesting schedule would allow a recipient to realize some value of the granted incentive even if they didn’t continue employment through the full vesting period. In executive compensation consulting engagements, graded vesting is often evaluated alongside performance metrics to balance motivation and risk.
- Performance-Based Vesting:
In this approach, the vesting of a granted award is tied to achievement against performance metrics. These could be companywide financial goals like revenue targets or individual executive performance measures. Payouts are tied to 3-or 4-year goals and ensure alignment with company strategy. Performance-based vesting is frequently incorporated into long-term incentive design to strengthen pay-for-performance alignment and connect executive compensation directly to measurable business outcomes.
Evaluating The Potential Dilution Impact
While long-term incentives serve as an excellent incentive, there’s a balance employers need to strike when designing such plans. Offering too much incentive, whether equity or cash, can dilute existing shareholders’ interests and potentially create governance challenges. A comprehensive executive compensation review should include modeling of dilution scenarios and sustainability analysis, particularly for growth-stage private companies preparing for future transactions.
It is important to calculate the potential dilution impact of any incentive and confirm it remains sustainable over the long term.
Keeping An Eye On Tax Implications
Long-term incentive compensation, while lucrative, also comes with its share of tax impacts. Both the company and the recipient can face tax implications, be it during the grant, vesting, or liquidity event, and they can vary based on the currency used to provide the incentive.
Collaborating with a compensation consultant and a tax advisor can help private companies navigate deferred compensation rules, valuation requirements, and compliance considerations tied to executive compensation arrangements.
Communicating The Plan Clearly
Even the most meticulously crafted long-term incentive plans for private companies can fall flat if not communicated effectively. It’s important that recipients understand the nuances of their compensation: the type of award they’re receiving, its potential value, vesting schedules, and what triggers might alter that schedule. Clear communication builds trust, ensures alignment, and maximizes the plan’s effectiveness as an incentive tool.
As private companies continue to compete for top executive talent, the role of long-term incentives in compensation packages becomes increasingly prominent. Navigating the complexities of these incentives requires a deep understanding of both financial instruments and human behavior. It’s not just about offering a “piece of the pie”; it’s about crafting a motivator that drives performance, retains talent, and aligns with the company’s long-term vision.
Zayla Partners’ compensation consulting team advises private, public, and nonprofit organizations on executive compensation, board of director compensation, and employee compensation strategy, helping clients align long-term incentive plans with sustainable growth and governance best practices. Schedule a consultation today.